Aperture to lightroom4

Well it’s been a long time in the coming but finally it happened.
This week I made the switch from Apple’s Aperture to Adobe’s Lightroom4.
Now a lot of people asked my why I did it, and most importantly HOW I did it. So today a small blogpost about my workflow for the switch and why….

 

Support
Let’s make one thing clear, I love Aperture.
However lately the frustration point for me was support for cameras.
I bought the Fuji X10 and that camera is not supported by Aperture, I’m testing the Fuji X Pro 1 and also that camera is not supported. And ok I can use of course the software delivered with the cameras but I want everything in one database, for the X10 this meant converting to DNG, something I actually don’t really want to do (I always want to keep my RAW files). For the X pro 1 however there was no way to do this (at that moment)…. However when I found out that the possibility that my new Leaf Credo 60 back will be supported is incredibly slim (read probably never, because there is also no support for other IIQ formats (Phase One) it was enough for me…. it would mean that I would need to use Capture One for the Leaf files, SilkyPix for the Fuji files (no database options) and Aperture for my old database.

 

Soon I thought, “why not use Aperture for my old database and LR4 for everything from now on”
But to be honest having 2 databases to look for something….. No I don’t think so either.
So I knew it was gonna hurt but I decided to make the switch 100%……

 

Did it hurt?
Well actually this was not so much the case.
Importing files is a bit of a problem the way I do it in Aperture, in short I always use folders on my drives and import these in the database (in the end this saved me a lot of time), in Aperture this meant that I would first create the structure on the hard drive (if not importing from the card) and later first had to make the same structure in my database. It was some work but in the end it worked the way I wanted.

 

In LR the import process is much easier, just add all the folders to the database and done… yep done.
Especially when on location this is cool, I can shoot the files, store them on the laptop and give keywords and rating, add GPS code and back home just copy it to the storage towers and import into the database. With Aperture this is possible but it’s more difficult.

 

The problem I had however was keywords, I really did not want to loose my keywords.
The solution is not perfect but I decided to do it this way. In Aperture there is an option called “Write  IPTC into RAW files”, this will embed the keywords into the RAW files. Now this is something that can go wrong but I searched on the net to see if there were real problems and the conclusion I got to was that in theory it COULD go wrong but in reality it would probably not happen. Now you can of course select all your files and do this but I found out that my Aperture would crash during that process plus it would probably take me a week. So I decided to make a smart album within Aperture with the keywords I wanted to save (which were a lot less then all the keywords I ever used), this took a few hours and it was done.

 

To be honest I was a bit afraid it would not work, however it worked flawless, the keywords were embedded and it all worked, problem 1 solved.

 

Adjustments
Now if you use a lot of adjustments, I’m sorry you’re in trouble.
As far as I could find there is no way to copy these.
For me this is however no real problem, only from some city trips I did the retouch in Aperture, from these series I just exported JPEGs from within Aperture and imported that folder into LR4 under the “retouched files drives”. If you however do all your retouching in Aperture I think the switch will be very painful.

 

Is there no hope?
Well yes there is of course.
If you (as I did) save all your images in separate folders on your drive, it’s no real hassle to just keep your Aperture database in tact, it’s a few GBs on your drive and it doesn’t grow from this moment on, I won’t upgrade my Aperture anymore, won’t add any more images to Aperture but I will just keep it on my hard drive for that moment that a customer wants an image including retouching that lives in Aperture and that I missed. Everything that is new will be retouched in LR4 of course.

 

Differences that really got my attention
Again, I did not switch for functionality, in reality I use Aperture or LR4 for what it’s designed for, for me it’s  just a browser,  search engine and if needed I will do some quick retouches, make slideshows, smart albums for export etc. All my serious retouching is done in Photoshop. I do use a color checker of course for my shots and this is something that really got my attention within LR4. Of course I knew that there is great plugin for the Colorchecker Passport (and Spydercheckr) and I did test this in the past however I immediately forgot about it because I would never use it because it was not supported in Aperture. However now that I work in LR4 this actually shaves a lot of time out of my workflow. I select my image with the color checker in LR4, run the plugin and the profile is saved both in LR4 and Photoshop, this saves me a lot of time…  Making a profile was not much work, but let’s be honest every minute you save is one minute you can do something else.

 

The quality of the develop engine is awesome of course from LR4, but I’m convinced that the new Aperture will probably also improve a lot, maybe better than LR4, maybe on par, we will know soon (I hope), but it will never be a reason for me to switch because as mentioned before the serious retouches are all done in Photoshop.

 

In the end the support for new cameras killed Aperture for me, I’ve used it for quiet some years, actually ever since version 1.
But at the moment it was getting ridiculous that I could actually only use the 5DMKIII and my old files (actually also some older leaf files were not supported which LR4 did import). The whole switch went actually rather painless (I was really worried), and I’m glad I did it. Adobe is much faster with camera support and let’s be honest all my buddies are using LR4 so I now have a wealth of knowledge to turn to…. 🙂

 

I think Adobe made the switch also a lot easier for people by it’s much lower price point of the new LR4. So I’m afraid (for Aperture) that slowly more and more people will be making the switch.

 

 

22 replies
    • Menno Herstel
      Menno Herstel says:

      Leo, you realy should update! LR4 is so very much better than earlier versions. It will make your live a lot easier! You can spent much more time behind the camera in stead of the computer, and that’s what LR is about. 😉

  1. d0ntp4n1c
    d0ntp4n1c says:

    Hey Frank, I’m thay guy that manually manages his folder structure on his NAS. 
    I’ve used Aperture in the past, and have looked into LR but I never found a good 
    reason to use one of these apps for photo management. 
    I guess it’s also because I never got in to it deep enough, or never had a tutorial about it. 
    Can you give me some tips on photo management, or point me to a good 
    tutorial about this, so I can see if it meets my needs?

    I must say that the colorchecker integration sounds good…

    Thanks!

    Dirk

  2. dirkuijt
    dirkuijt says:

    Hey Frank, I’m thay guy that manually manages his folder structure on his NAS. I’ve used Aperture in the past, and have looked into LR but I never found a good reason to use one of these apps for photo management. I guess it’s also because I never got in to it deep enough, or never had a tutorial about it. Can you give me some tips on photo management, or point me to a good tutorial about this, so I can see if it meets my needs?
    I must say that the colorchecker integration sounds good…
    Thanks!
    Dirk

    (edit: sorry for double-posting)

  3. Joerg Knoerchen
    Joerg Knoerchen says:

    Hey Frank, well I’m still using Aperture, but as you did already many other well known Photographer consider to switch or did the step over to LR like you did now. As my gear still is supported and no new gear is planned that might be unsupported by now I stay with Aperture and I’m also using it since ever V1 was published. But also for me it seems just a question of time until I will also make the step “forward” or better “away” from Aperture and for the same reason you mentioned the lack of the DNG and camera profile support with the  Colorchecker Passport. Maybe I’ll give Aperture a chance until it’s hopefully soon published new version (if it will ever come and not be a new product like Apple did it with Final Cut Pro X) but if it is not coming in the near future the chance of switching is getting bigger and bigger… and I’m already looking tutorials and training videos to get LR to know better and to see how things works over there…

    • Frank Doorhof
      Frank Doorhof says:

      It’s for me not a matter of not liking Aperture it’s indeed simply the RAW support and that’s lacking lately with Apple, I don’t know why. In the past for me at least, it seems like they supported almost anything. But lately it’s been dramatic.

  4. Menno Herstel
    Menno Herstel says:

    Hi Frank welcome to the world of LR 😉 I’ve been using it from day 1 (febr. 2007) and still very satisfied. Every version is better, camera support is updated fast. At Adobe they realise that’s important. One thing is a pity: you have to buy every new version, like LR1, LR2, LR3 and LR4, so for new users LR4 costs about € 130,-, for me LR4 was somewhere around € 500,-

  5. Rob
    Rob says:

    Converteren naar dng is eigenlijk een goed idee. Raw files zijn van een format van de camera maker. dng is een gestandaardiseerde format. Dng bevat bovendien evenveel informatie als een raw file. Dus de kans dat je je foto’s in de toekomst kan blijven openen is het grootst bij dng.

    • Frank Doorhof
      Frank Doorhof says:

      Sorry, don’t agree with that.
      For example with the Leaf/phase One files there is information “lost”, also working with the native software to remove Moire for example is not possible anymore from the DNG file format.

      So I’m not a big fan of that.

  6. Jeff Largent
    Jeff Largent says:

    The most telling statement in this post is “we will know soon (I hope)”, and was the main reason I gave up on Aperture.  The new version of aperture might come out tomorrow or 5 years from now.  Apple has taken their secrecy to the point it hurts the customer.

    • Frank Doorhof
      Frank Doorhof says:

      I feel a bit the same, on the other hand what I do like from Apple is that the moment it’s announced it’s available, I hate to see some stunning software or hardware and know I have to wait 6-7 months for it 😀

  7. John Wilkinson
    John Wilkinson says:

    Frank…Thanks for sharing. I’m new to LR4 myself, although I’ve been using LR3 for some time now. I’ve been more then happy with its features and functionality. I think you’ll ultimately be pleased with the transition even though it was a somewhat painful decision.

  8. mvickers
    mvickers says:

    Just curious, considering that you mostly used Aperture for digital asset management and not really for editing did you consider Captures Media Manager as you already use Capture One. Just curious.

    • Frank Doorhof
      Frank Doorhof says:

      I did look at it and that was it.
      LR4 and Aperture are both large supported packages, loads of people using it, loads of support from users and the companies, and regular updates.

      I’m afraid to put all my work into a package that may one day be obsolete or simple put not supporting a camera I use.

    • mvickers
      mvickers says:

      Thanks Frank, I had been looking at it as I like the way Capture One processes RAW files. I might have to take a closer look at LR4.

  9. John_Skinner
    John_Skinner says:

    The color checker plug-in was worth the switch over period. Allowing the profiles to be applied to the images just shot, along with bodylens combinations is priceless. I moved over about 18 months ago and haven’t looked back since.

    BTW Frank.. Congrats on your image being used in this months ShutterBug for ROUGE FlashBenders product line. If we can only get the MAC group to ‘see the light’ and jump all over you with sponsorship.. Man you have sure come a LONG way with worldwide recognition in the last 5 years.. 100,000’s can’t be wrong !

    • Frank Doorhof
      Frank Doorhof says:

      Thank you, and indeed the last few years have been a roller coaster ride, and it’s going faster and faster it seems, and enjoying every minute of it 😀

  10. Fraucha
    Fraucha says:

    I had been using Aperture since inception also and had some concern about switching to LR4. I still love Aperture but I am now fully integrated into the cloud and everything is just there for me. LR4 has a small learning curve, I watched some videos on Kelby Training and I was dialed in and hooked. Really easy to use, works [perfect with Nik-Software’s plugins, seamless integration into and out of PS CS6. Worth the effort!

Comments are closed.